CEDAW 30th Session: Review of report of Belarus



23/01/2004

Press Release
WOM/1430

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women

643rd & 644th Meetings (AM & PM)

CAMPAIGN NEEDED TO RAISE AWARENESS OF WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS,
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE TOLD

But Delegation Says Increased Opportunities Have Provided Diverse
Possibilities for Women's Participation in All Spheres
of Life

Following the presentation in two meetings today by the delegation of
Belarus on government efforts to implement the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, one expert
of the Committee that monitors progress in that regard called for a
"massive paradigm shift" to provide women in Belarus with
an enabling environment for change.

The expert from Germany, serving with 22 others in their personal
capacities on the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against
Women, said that, as long as women in Belarus were associated only
with family responsibilities, they would be discriminated against in
the labour market.   Belarus was moving into a market economy, and
women were at risk of discrimination in that process without a
concerted campaign to raise awareness about their equal human rights,
she said.

Economic reforms and a reassessment of spiritual values in the past
decade in Belarus had been accompanied by a rethinking of
women's role in society, according to that country's
combined fourth through sixth periodic report as a State party to the
1981 Convention.   Heading the delegation today was the Deputy
Permanent Representative of Belarus to the United Nations, Aleg
Ivanou, who said that the period 2000-2004 was a vibrant one in
Belarus' national gender policy.

He said it was hard to find any sphere of public life today that had
not undergone major change.   According to the human development
index, Belarus ranked 53 out of 175 and now had a high level of human
development.   Increased opportunities had provided diverse forms for
women's participation in all spheres of life.   The uncertainty,
stress and lack of confidence that characterized the situation of
women in the beginning of the 1990s no longer existed.

Nevertheless, he pointed to recently concluded research that had
indicated that nearly 30 per cent of women in Belarus had suffered
physical violence by their spouses, and about 12 per cent had
suffered sexual harassment in the workplace.   Violence against women
was one of the most serious obstacles to achieving gender equality,
and family violence not only undermined the viability of each family,
but also the foundation of future security of society.   Now that it
was "visible", the subject was being addressed at all
levels, he said.

Experts, including the Chairperson from Turkey, Ayse Feride Acar,
thanked the delegation for its reports and for the oral presentation,
which had shed further light on the steps taken by the Government to
"bring the Convention to life for the women on the
ground".   They commended the legislative reforms, which had
included adoption of new laws on marriage and labour, and the
anticipated passage in 2004 of a law on gender equality.   Steps had
also been taken to overhaul school curricula, aimed at eliminating
gender stereotypes, they noted.

Despite the legislative reforms, a Committee Vice-Chairperson and
expert from Romania worried that those measures were still overly
protective of women as mothers.   The approach had been to focus
attention solely on women's reproductive and social
responsibilities, which could create further obstacles for women in
employment and public life.   That could also discourage the sharing
of responsibilities in the household with men.

Similarly, a Committee Vice-Chairperson and expert from the Republic
of Korea said she had the impression from the report and oral
presentation that, in Belarus, maintenance of the family was seen as
more important than promoting and protecting women's human
rights.   Throughout the reports, the family was considered very
important, and, of course, it was, but she doubted whether the
Government had a sense of women as individuals whose rights should be
protected within the family.

Another dominant theme in today's discussion was the
relationship of women's non-governmental organizations with the
Government.   Warning that it was too early to speak of the
women's movement in Belarus as a mass movement with influence
on decision-making, the expert from Hungary, along with several other
experts, sought more information about the application process, the
distribution of funding by the Government and the level of
independence of those organizations.

The expert from Nigeria asked about the "severe
persecutions" of non-governmental organizations in Belarus.
She specifically wanted to know if the Government was experiencing
any difficulties in collaborating with them and which
non-governmental organizations had actually participated in drafting
the country reports.   She also asked the delegation to identify the
"specific projects" being carried out by those groups and
their impact on women's rights.

Regarding the functioning of non-governmental organizations, a
Government representative explained that a non-governmental
organization could only be eliminated through legal proceeding, as in
any democratic country, and the justifiability of such action could
also be taken to court.   A relevant presidential decree of April 2003
had been harshly criticized by non-governmental organizations and had
been sent back for further improvements to ensure that the rights of
civil-society groups were protected, he said.

Other members of the delegation were:   Anzhela K. Karnyaluk,
Councillor, Department of humanitarian, ecological and
scientific-technical cooperation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
Irina A. Chutkova, Head of the Department of family policy and gender
issues, Ministry of Labour and Social Protection; Rehina A.
Davidovich, Co-Chair of the Belarusian Women's Union; Andrei A.
Taranda, Second Secretary of the Permanent Mission to the United
Nations.

The Committee will meet again at 10 a.m. on Monday, 26 January to
consider the combined fourth and fifth reports of Ethiopia.

Background

When the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
met today to consider the situation of women in Belarus, it had
before it that country's combined fourth, fifth and sixth
period report (document CEDAW/C/BLR/4-6), dated 19 December 2002.

Part I of the report provides an overview of the social and economic
situation in Belarus, its demography, as well as institutional
mechanisms established to implement the provisions of the Committee
on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.   Part II
describes the legislative, administrative and other measures adopted
to give effect to the Convention.   Part III provides an overview of
progress achieved in advancing the status of women there, as well as
remaining obstacles.

Concerning the latter part, the report says that the social and
economic reforms carried out in Belarus during the 1990s contributed
to the establishment of the elements of a market economy, the
creation of a non-State sector and the emergence of new relations in
the labour market.   These economic reforms and a reassessment of
spiritual values were accompanied by a rethinking of women's
role in society.

The resulting changes expanded women's opportunities for
self-fulfilment and provided them with many opportunities for
participation in the country's social, employment, political
and public life, the report finds.   Throughout the period under
review, efforts to improve national legislation continued, bringing
it into line with international legal norms.   This has been
supplemented by efforts to enhance women's legal literacy.   The
most significant changes in this area have been the adoption of the
new Marriage and Family Code and the new Labour Code.

The period 1994-2001 also saw the government approval of 15
documents, which have major significance for the effort to increase
the social protection afforded to families, women and children, and
for the development of a system of social services.   The period
overall was characterized by a marked strengthening of the role of
local authorities and administrative bodies and the implementation of
measures to enhance the status of women in all areas and prevent
gender-based discrimination.

The report notes that, also in that period, a national mechanism was
established to implement a policy for ensuring gender equality and
the elimination of discrimination against women.   To promote the
development and implementation of a gender policy in Belarus, a
National Council on Gender Policy was established within the Council
of Ministers of the Republic in May 2000.   An important mechanism for
action has been the holding of a series of applied scientific
conferences, round tables and training seminars at the national and
local levels to review the current situation and formulate strategies
and tactics for enhancing women's status.

Also according to the report, there has been a significant increase
in the activities of women's organizations, and cooperation
between them and governmental bodies in the implementation of
national policy to enhance women's status is increasing.   The
review period was marked by a gradual increase in women's
participation in decision-making in the political, economic and
social spheres.   In May 2001, the Government approved the second
national plan of action for gender equality, through 2005.   Above
all, the plan seeks to create conditions that will provide equal
opportunities for both genders and reduce the gap between their de
jure and de facto equality in all areas of life.

Notwithstanding those and other achievements, the report states that
"In Belarus, as in other countries, serious obstacles stand in
the way of a solution" to gender discrimination.   Among them is
the inertia that tends to characterize social processes.   This is
reflected in the lag between the time a measure is adopted on
women's behalf and the time significant results are achieved
through its implementation.   Also, it takes a long time to develop
new protective mechanisms capable of responding to possible new
socio-economic phenomena.

The report finds that another factor slowing down the process is the
complex economic situation, which is further aggravated by the need
to allocate more than 10 per cent of the State budget for efforts to
eliminate the effects of the disaster at the Chernobyl atomic energy
plant.   Moreover, although there are no legislative provisions that
discriminate against women, the guarantees set out in these measures
are not always fully implemented.   That process is not helped by the
fact that neither draft legislative and regulatory texts nor the
legislation in force are informed by the requisite gender expertise.

There are instances of violations of Belarusian legislation with
respect to women's entry into and dismissals from the
workforce, the report states.   More than 12 per cent of working women
are employed in facilities that do not meet sanitary or health
standards.   Over the past decade, financial insecurity has grown
among both women and men.   The share of men having per capita incomes
below the standard minimum rose from 39.4 per cent in 1995 to 42.9
per cent in 2000, while the corresponding figures for women rose from
37.4 per cent to 41 per cent.

Also, the persistence of stereotypes regarding men's and
women's social roles, the inadequate development of
civil-society structures and the reluctance of society as a whole to
accept new notions of equal opportunity all have an impact on efforts
to enhance women's social status, the report states.   Problems
of gender equality are still viewed by many as being exclusively
women's issues rather than being viewed in the overall context
of socio-economic problems.

The report says that another serious obstacle is the insufficient
involvement of men in efforts to ensure gender equality.   A major
problem is the lack of statistical data on many issues and the lack
of in-depth research on the influence of transformational processes
on all aspects of women's and men's activities.   While a
national mechanism for the implementation of gender policy at the
local level is slowly being created, the level of qualification of
experts in this field is noticeably inadequate.   Today, women in
Belarus continue to be "insufficiently represented" at
the decision-making level in legislative and executive government
bodies.

Introduction of Report

ALEG IVANOU, Deputy Permanent Representative of Belarus, emphasized
the importance of the period 2000-2004 which represented a vibrant
period in Belarus' national gender policy.   Today, it was hard
to find any sphere of public life that not undergone major change.
The social and economic changes of the second half of the 1990s had
resulted in the privatization of the economy and new labour
relations.   Today, Belarus was a dynamically developing European
country.   According to the human development index, Belarus ranked 53
out of 175 and now had a high level of human development.   Increased
opportunities had provided diverse forms for women's
participation in all spheres of life.   The uncertainty, stress and
lack of confidence that characterized the situation of women in the
beginning of the 1990s no longer existed.

Belarus had taken a major step forward, he said, including by
adopting legal, organizational and administrative measures to enhance
the status of women and to protect their rights and interests.   After
the Beijing Conference, the 1996-2000 platform for action had been
successfully implemented.   Much work had been done to improve
legislation and bring it in line with international standards.   A new
civil code, code on marriage and the family and labour code had been
adopted.   Belarus had fully implemented the Convention and had made
the Optional Protocol part of its law.   [In 2002, Belarus signed the
Optional Protocol.]

The implementation of Belarus' State policy to eliminate
distinctions between men and women depended on the capacity of
national mechanisms, he said.   In May 2000 the National Council on
Gender Policy had been created.   In 2003, the composition of that
body was changed, and a new work programme was prepared.

In recent years, there had been a notable intensification of local
bodies in implementing strategies to advance women, he said.   Special
programmes were being carried out to promote the employment, health
care, and reproductive rights of women.   A positive step had been the
development of the women's movement.   There had been
improvements in gender statistics, as well.   The status of women was
more broadly covered by the mass media.

Despite such measures, however, the inertia inherent in social
processes had hindered progress, he said.   The lack of funding for
the implementation of the national gender policy, the persistence of
stereotypes, and insufficient involvement of men in women's
issues represented obstacles to the advancement of women.   Although
the level of legislative decrees had increased, the guarantees
enshrined in them were not fully implemented.

Gender policy today was aimed at overcoming all forms of gender
discrimination, he said.   Priority areas included human rights, the
economy, social protection, education, health, decision-making,
violence, the mass media and the development of institutional
mechanisms to improve the status of women.

Regarding women in political life, following the 2001 elections, the
number of women deputies to the house of representatives had
increased, he said.   In the national council, 28.1 per cent were
women.   There had been a gradual increase in the number of women in
local councils.   In 2003, local councils saw the election of some
10,422 women, or 44.4 per cent of the total number of deputies.   In
2000, there had been one woman minister in the Government.   In 2003,
there were 10 women deputy ministers.

Women were also well represented in the judicial branch.   Some 46 per
cent of judges were women, and about 62 per cent of lawyers were
women.   Some 93.4 per cent of State notaries were women.   In 1990,
there had been only three women in the Supreme Court, or 13.6 per
cent.   In 2003, there were 11, or 28.9 per cent.   He also noted that
of 44 State institutions of higher learning, three had women
provosts.   A master's degree in women's leadership was
also offered as of 2002.

On the status of women in the labour market, he said that in
accordance with the law, State employment services provided equal
opportunities for all citizens.   Citizens were guaranteed free
training, assistance in finding jobs, opportunities for participation
in paid public work, free information on job vacancies and legal
protection.   High priority areas had included assistance in finding
employment, development of territorial mobility, vocational training,
support for independent employment and quotas for jobs in existing
enterprises.   Highest priority had been given to finding jobs for
unemployed women.   Employment centres carried out job fairs and open
houses.   Last year, vocational training had been given to more than
17,000 unemployed women.   Vocational training expanded the
opportunities for unemployed persons to find work.

The Government supported women's entrepreneurship, he said.   In
2003, financial assistance had been given to more than 1,100 women.
The major forms of self-employment included sewing, knitting,
wholesale buying, hairdressing, cosmetology and tailoring.

He said the Government also provided leave entitlements for childcare
to both mothers and fathers.   State allowances were given for
children, with some 30 per cent of all children receiving
allowances.   Allowances were financed from State social insurance
budgets.   The State also offered tax abatements, school allowances
and free food.   A crucial part of the State system for social
protection was providing social services for a broad range of
economic, legal and pedagogical social services.

There had recently been an unfortunate trend in the population,
namely, a sharp rise in the death rates for men and a worsening of
the health situation overall, he continued.   There had also been an
increase in "socially dangerous" illnesses, such as
alcoholism, drug abuse, venereal disease, and so forth.   Some
encouraging indicators were emerging, however, in terms of ensuring
women's reproductive health, including through new medical
technology, which permitted early identification of disease.
Preventing problems in pregnancy and childbirth was a priority, and
measures had been put in place to improve pregnant women's
nutrition.   Information now was also being made available on family
planning and "reproductive conduct".

He said that the number of abortions had dropped and the number of
women using modern contraception had increased.   Also, the gender
aspect was increasingly taken into account, involving mothers and
fathers in childbirth.   That had also helped to encourage responsible
parenthood on the part of the men.   The number of fathers attending
births had been increasing annually, and greater emphasis had been
given to menopause and both male and female infertility.   Efforts
were also under way to prevent HIV/AIDS transmission from mother to
child through free voluntary testing for women.   The Government was
studying international experience in combating AIDS.   As in many
other countries with transitional economies, the main problem in
preventing HIV/AIDS in Belarus had been the lack of adequate
budgetary resources.

Concerning violence against women, he said that that was one of the
most serious obstacles to achieving gender equality.   The problem of
domestic violence against women had been analysed and results were in
from five research endeavours spanning the past seven years.
According to one finding, 29.4 per cent of women polled had suffered
physical violence in their families by their spouses, and about 12
per cent had suffered sexual harassment in the workplace.   That
situation certainly demanded intervention by the State and society,
as a whole.   The Ministry of Internal Affairs had developed a special
system of monitoring "troublemakers", and more than
17,000 had been identified.   Official warnings could be lodged
against them, and they could be sent to training or labour centres,
and deprived of their parental rights.

Family violence not only undermined the viability of each family, but
also undermined the foundation of the future security of society, he
said.   Psychological help for victims was also being provided.
Belarus had participated in the United Nations Development Fund for
Women (UNIFEM) project, as well as the regional information and
educational campaign, "A Life Free of Violence".
Preventing violence against women had also been discussed often at
seminars and meetings with non-governmental organizations.   Such
violence had become visible to society as a whole and had become the
focus of social organizations and the media.

Another extremely serious problem of great concern to the Government
and society was prostitution and the sexual exploitation of women and
children.   His Government had fully accepted the Committee's
recommendations on that issue.   Awareness of the complexity of
trafficking in women was being enhanced by the Government's
programmes (2002-2007) to counter that phenomenon and prostitution.
The Government had also ratified the United Nations Convention on
Transnational Crime along with three of its additional protocols,
including one on trafficking.   Also, preparatory work had begun on
establishing social services in Minsk and setting up a shelter for
women who had been "dragged" into trafficking.   He hoped
that the Committee would take duly into account the steps taken by
Belarus to try to achieve genuine gender equality.

Experts' Comments/Questions

Committee Chairperson and expert from Turkey, AYSE FERIDE ACAR,
thanked the delegation for its reports and expressed the
Committee's gratitude for the oral presentation, which had shed
further light on the steps taken by the Government to bring the
Convention to life for women on the ground.   Some good news had also
been provided regarding the fate of the Optional Protocol, as that
instrument had now become law in Belarus, but in order for it to
truly come into force, the Government must ratify it.

GORAN MELANDER, expert from Sweden, sought clarification about who
participated in the preparation of the report.   It seemed that
establishing a women's organization or non-governmental
organization was a rather complicated procedure in Belarus.   The
registration procedure seemed to be protracted and might even be
impeding the establishment of a new organization.   Such a procedure
might run contrary to the principle of freedom of association.   He
wished to be further enlightened about the existing procedure to
establish a new non-governmental organization.

Regarding the status of the Convention, he said he still had the
impression that it was not yet directly applicable to domestic law.
To what extent was the Convention known in the country?
Specifically, were the judicial authorities aware of its existence;
was it being applied; and had any reference been made to it in any
legal cases?

VICTORIA POPESCU SANDRU, Vice-Chairperson and expert from Romania,
noted some of the elements of progress, such as the steps forward in
legislative reform and the adoption of several new laws on marriage
and labour.   It was stated that a draft law on gender equality would
be adopted in 2004.   What were its objectives and what was the time
frame for elaboration and adoption?

She noticed from the report, however, that the concerns expressed by
the Committee in 2000 were still valid concerning legislation, as it
was overly protective of women as mothers.   That legislative approach
had focused on mothers' protection and women's
reproductive functions and social responsibilities.   That emphasis
could create further obstacles for women in employment and in their
social role.   That also discouraged the sharing of responsibilities
in the household with men.   What concrete steps were being taken in
that regard? she asked.

KRISZTINA MORVAI, expert from Hungary, said she appreciated the
Government's frankness regarding the problems with the
women's movement and women's non-governmental
organizations, but it was still too early to speak of the
women's movement as a mass movement with influence on
decision-making.   That was what it should be all about, and together
perhaps a checklist could be made to improve that situation.

Exactly how many women's organizations were there right now in
Belarus? she asked.   Had that changed since the 2001 to 2005 gender
equality plan?   How were women's non-governmental organizations
funded and had that procedure changed in the past five years?   How
was the money distributed by the Government, and were grant
applications and procedures open and transparent?   Also, what exactly
had been the role of non-governmental organizations in the report
preparation process?

HANNA BEATE SCHOPP-SCHILLING, expert from Germany, said she saw some
progress, but some major problems still remained.   Engaging fathers
in family work was welcomed, but what was really needed was a
"massive paradigm shift".   As long as women were
associated only with family responsibilities, they would be
discriminated against in the labour market.   Belarus was moving into
a market economy, and women would be at risk of discrimination in the
labour market.   She wanted to see a concerted effort, a campaign, so
that a paradigm shift would take place, without which the lack of an
enabling environment for women would continue.

She said she had the impression that many of the women's
projects were financed by international organizations.   While she
welcomed that, she feared for their sustainability.   She had been
impressed by the high number of female judges and advocates, but
there was a discrepancy between that high level of available training
and the lack of court cases.   Something was missing:   either women
were not sufficiently aware of their rights, or they were too
distraught, disappointed and overworked that they did not avail
themselves of their legal options.   To what extent had there been a
massive dissemination of information on the rights of women based on
the Convention? she asked.

NAELA GABR, expert from Egypt, stressed the need to enhance the
national machinery for women, particularly in the areas of their
health and social status.   She also sought additional details about
its ability to function, as well as its sustainability and
structure.   What about women's participation in formulating
development strategies?   She had noticed that the role of women was
diminishing in the hierarchies of decision-making and asked whether
women could be enabled to formulate strategies.

HEISOO SHIN, Vice-Chairperson and expert from Republic of Korea, said
she had the impression from the report and oral presentation that, in
Belarus, maintenance of family was seen as more important than
promoting and protecting women's human rights.   Throughout the
reports, the family was considered very important.   Of course it was,
but she doubted whether the Government had a sense of women as
individuals whose rights should be protected within the family.

She said she had been pleased to learn that domestic violence against
women was now considered to be a social problem.   Noting that 29.4
per cent of women had experienced physical violence, she asked if the
research had also probed the extent of sexual, verbal and
psychological violence.   She was troubled by a monitoring system that
would characterize the male perpetrators as
"troublemakers".   Describing them in those terms only
trivialized the issue, which was really terribly important.

DORCAS AMA FREMA COKER-APPIAH, expert from Ghana, wanted to know
exactly what the Government was doing to deal with domestic
violence.   Concerning the penal code, she was interested to know more
about the choice of words regarding rape, which seemed to imply that
that was a crime only if the victim was under the age of 16.

DUBRAVKA SIMONOVIC, expert from Croatia, said all transitional
countries faced many difficulties and challenges.   Nevertheless, it
was very important to uphold international treaties when changing
national laws.   Also, did the Constitution contain a prohibition of
discrimination based on sex, and was there an explicit provision on
gender equality?   Concerning the report's preparation, had it
been approved by the Government, by the Ministry of Labour or by the
national machinery?

FATIMA KWAKU, expert from Nigeria, asked for a comment about the
"severe persecutions" of non-governmental organizations
in Belarus.   Was the Government experiencing any difficulties in
collaborating with them?   Which non-governmental organizations had
actually participated in the writing of the report, and what was the
actual extent of their participation?   The end of the report stated
that there had been a significant increase in the activities of
women's organizations -– currently about 20 in number --
which were carrying out a series of specific projects.   Could the
delegation provide specific examples of those and of their impact on
women's rights?   Were those non-governmental organizations
carrying out those activities on their own or in collaboration with
the Government?

Country Response

Addressing the issue of ratification of the Convention's
Optional Protocol, a member of the delegation said the Optional
Protocol would be ratified by the Parliament.   In accordance with
national legislation, however, the relevant law regarding the
ratification of the Convention had to be adopted first.   Ratification
was not just a political gesture, which was why there had been a
delay in submitting the ratification documents.   He believed those
documents would be submitted in the next month.   The Convention was
directly applied in national legislation, and the primacy of
international law was certain.

On the participation of non-governmental organizations, he said there
might be some problems regarding interpretation.   The law provided
only for the concept of "public association" in Belarus.
The activities of such organizations, starting with the registration
process, were bound by law.   One could argue that the registration
process was protracted or difficult, but it was consonant with law.
He did not wish to indicate that everything was wonderful.   However,
the number of public associations per inhabitant in Belarus was among
the highest in Europe.

Another delegate noted that one of the basic components of the
national plan was the section on women and human rights.   In
accordance with the national plan of action, the draft law on gender
equality was to be adopted in 2004.   She regretted, however, that the
timetable for the draft law's adoption had been deferred.   The
ratification of the Optional Protocol, however, would serve as a
trigger in convincing the necessary agencies that the draft must be
adopted.   Two working groups had been established to assist in the
process.   By April 2004, they would draw up the outline for the draft
law.

She noted that the law on demographic security, adopted in 2002,
stated that in each family, the man and woman concerned had the right
to choose their type of reproductive behaviour.   As of now, Belarus
was drawing up its sustainable development strategy for the period up
until 2020, which included a section on gender policy.
Unfortunately, the strategy had not yet been approved.   The draft
document contained approaches to establish gender equality and to
ensure the equal division of responsibilities, in terms of both
family and professional obligations.

The draft bill to change the labour code was designed to eliminate
the dual approach for dealing with mothers in the labour market and
to ensure that all childcare benefits were applicable to both women
and men.

Regarding the participation of non-governmental organizations in the
report's preparation, she said a mechanism allowing them to
directly participate did not exist.   However, since the Ministry of
Labour and Social Welfare cooperated with the various women's
associations, the report represented the range of their activities.
Activities to improve women's knowledge of the law were carried
out with the active participation of women's associations.   For
the first time, a gender based evaluation of the labour, marriage and
family and criminal codes had been carried out.

Financing for non-governmental organization activities was carried
out primarily through grants, she said.   She hoped the draft bill on
social projects would make it possible to create a mechanism for the
redistribution of funding so that non-governmental organizations
could carry out socially significant projects.   The financing of any
non-governmental organization from the State budget was forbidden.
Funds could be allocated to finance special projects presented by
such organizations, however.

Concerning the Gypsy community, another delegate said the most recent
census showed that the Gypsy community was extremely small in Belarus
and it would be hard to cite precise statistics.   That did not mean
that attention was not given to the subject of national minorities,
as Belarus was a multinational republic.   It was probably the only
country of the Commonwealth of Independent States region not to have
experienced ethnic conflict.

Experts' Comments/Questions

FRANC,OISE GASPARD, the expert from France, said the report showed
that much remained to be done to ensure equality between men and
women in Belarus.   Regarding the participation of women in public
life, she asked for clarification regarding the report's text
on women in leadership positions.   While it might be a matter of
interpretation, the language seemed to be full of prejudice, such as
women not having learned how to compete in politics.   Political
parties were often reluctant to include women.   Had any research been
carried out in that regard and was there a specific commission in the
Parliament to deal specifically with gender equality?

MERIEM BELMIHOUB-ZERDANI, the expert from Algeria, said she
appreciated the country's significant efforts to improve the
situation of women.   Belarus had become independent not so long ago
following great political, economic, social and cultural upheaval.
Some 20 per cent of natural resources had been used to recover from
the Chernobyl accident.   Belarus depended on the outside for many of
its provisions, including oil and fuel.

In general, Belarus had accomplished much in record time given great
financial difficulties.   She was pleased that progress had been made
in the number of women in the national assembly.   Significant numbers
of women were also in the civil service, the judiciary and the
diplomatic community.   State institutions could help in ensuring that
women were represented in public life.

CORNELIS FLINTERMAN, expert from the Netherlands, noted that the
Constitution of Belarus guaranteed the right of association.   A
number of women's organizations had been established and were
playing an increasingly important role.   He was concerned, however,
that despite the recognition of the need to expand social
partnership, the lack of legislation on social needs had limited the
process in that regard.

He said he had received information that non-governmental
organizations in general, and women's non-governmental
organizations in particular, were facing serious problems.   The
Government was adopting selective policies, and engagement depended
on a degree of loyalty.   He understood that the Government could not
directly finance non-governmental organizations, which meant they
were dependent on foreign support.   The Government was monitoring
financial support, and non-governmental organizations were subjected
to re-registration procedures, which imposed heavy financial burdens
on the organizations.   He had also been informed that
non-governmental organizations were not allowed to represent women
members of their own organization in court procedures.   He asked for
further clarification of the Government vis-a`-vis the role of
non-governmental organizations, in particular women's
organizations.

ROSARIO MANALO, the expert from the Philippines, said that while
Member States had the obligation to take steps to strengthen the role
of non-governmental organizations, they had the bigger obligation of
providing them with a considerable measure of autonomy and a
reasonable degree of freedom in their work to encourage greater
participation without the fear of repressive action.

On women in public life, she asked for a breakdown in the number of
women in the judiciary.   Were there measures to inspire women to
become a Supreme Court chief justice?   What was the State policy to
create an enabling environment to climb to top judicial positions?

Ms. KWAKU, expert from Nigeria, asked about women in foreign service
and the diplomatic corps, as there had not been much information
about that in the report.   How many women represented the country at
the international level?   She said she particularly wanted to hear
statistical details, if possible.

CHRISTINE KAPALATA, Rapporteur and expert from the United Republic of
Tanzania, agreed that there was a lack of data about women in the
diplomatic corps.   What were the constraints, and was the Government
happy with that situation? she asked.   How comprehensive was the
National Plan of Action for Gender Equality 2001-2005, and had it
taken into account the promotion of women in foreign service?   Four
women ambassadors was a low figure, she added.

Ms. KWAKU, expert from Nigeria, said the report seemed to indicate
that, in Belarus, there was absolutely no discrimination in
citizenship and nationality law.   She asked for confirmation that a
woman in Belarus could pass her citizenship onto her children, just
as a man could.   She also asked if the woman could transfer her
citizenship to her foreign husband, and whether both men and women
had the same requirements and opportunities to acquire citizenship.

Country Response

A representative of Belarus said that in the country's 40 or so
foreign missions, women accounted for about 12 per cent of the
staffing with fewer serving at the rank of ambassador.   In addition,
one woman was ambassador-at-large in the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs.   Among the central ministry staff, women accounted for more
than 37 per cent.   He could not speak about discrimination concerning
those women abroad, but he assured the experts that, on both the
legislative and daily-life level, there was "absolutely no
discrimination of any kind" on women's right to choose
their work or to work abroad.

He also detailed the number of women in "joint
enterprises", which amounted to some 10 per cent.   Twice as
many women, about 300, had State enterprises.   The number of women
leaders in both State and non-State organizations was practically
identical.   In terms of the absolute number of non-governmental
organizations, Belarus ranked near the top.

Regarding the functioning of non-governmental organizations, he
explained that a non-governmental organization could only be
eliminated through legal proceeding, as in any democratic country,
and a judgement as to the justifiability of such action could also be
taken to court.   Under existing legislation, any citizen or public
organization could sue for their rights, particularly under article
62 of the Constitution.   All citizens had the right to legal
assistance.   The relevant presidential decree of April 2003 had been
harshly criticized by non-governmental organizations and had been
sent for further improvements to ensure that the rights of civil
society groups were protected.

In drawing up the national gender policy, an expert had rightly
understood that without women's participation in formulating
strategies, problems would arise.   Virtually every ministry had
personnel charged with the promotion of women staff, which would
promote them along the hierarchy and eventually "move them
upstairs", another representative said.

At the same time, however, she said that no one could deny that there
were long lasting stereotypes in society and biases in terms of women
becoming full-fledged members in the decision-making process in
Belarus.   But, step by step, progress was being made.   A great
impetus had been the adoption in 1999 of a programme requiring a
human rights information campaign in all educational institutions.
As a result, courses had been introduced, with special emphasis on
the human rights of women.   When monitoring the National Plan,
information was received regularly from the Education Ministry to see
what measures were being taken to ensure that the courses of study
made human rights issues a reality.   Refresher courses were being
given to schoolteachers and university instructors, and textbooks
were being reviewed.

In the judiciary, she said it was true that there was a high level of
women judges, but a low level of women's cases.   To another
question, she said that there was no separate commission for women in
the National Assembly, but several commissions throughout the
government dealt with women's issues.   A separate commission,
however, would help resolve concerns more easily, she acknowledged.

In terms of citizenship, she said that both women and men, in terms
of acquiring citizenship and transferring it to their foreign
spouses, had equal rights.   If a child was born on the territory of
Belarus and one parent was a citizen and one was not, the child would
automatically assume citizenship of Belarus.   If the child was not
born on the territory, then it was up to the parents to apply for
citizenship on an equal footing.   That was also reflected in the code
on marriage and family, which stated that both husband and wife in
the family had equal rights and equal opportunities.

On domestic violence questions, she said the data had indicated that
psychological violence was more widespread than physical -- 70 to 80
per cent of women experienced it, both in family and in public life.
The UNIFEM project and the consciousness-raising programme on a life
free of violence had made it possible to enter that topic into
discussion.   Results of the data had also showed that both the State
and the general population were giving greater attention to that
problem.

Experts' Comments/Questions

FUMIKO SAIGA, expert from Japan, asked about discrimination regarding
retirement age and pensions.   Was that included in the draft
amendment of the Labour Code, or was it contained in another law?
She reiterated that many replies had not been contained in the
delegation's written responses to the pre-session working
group's questions.   For example, there had been a question
about migrant workers, but the Government had responded by discussing
refugees.   Were migrant workers accorded refugee status?

SJAMSIAH ACHMAD, expert from Indonesia, said that the educational
measures taken within the context of the Plan of Action for Gender
Equality 2001 to 2005 to eliminate gender stereotype among the young
generation through school curricula had been commendable, and not
many countries had done that.   At the same time, she sought
additional information about the attitudes and behaviours of boys and
girls, as it was important to monitor those.

Did the curriculum review include an introduction of human rights
education in schools?   She also asked for information about the
master's course in women's leadership, specifically about
its content, objectives and principles.   How many women and men were
enrolled in that programme?

Ms. POPESCU-SANDRU, expert from Romania, asked for clarification on
measures to encourage women to work in less traditional areas.   She
also wanted information on school dropout rates among girls.   She
noted that abortion continued to be the main method of birth control
and asked for more clarification in that regard.   She asked for
sex-disaggregated data on the number of people with HIV/AIDS and
sexually transmitted diseases.

PRAMILA PATTEN, expert from Mauritius, asked what measures the
Government was taking to address pay inequalities.   Given the
vulnerable situation of women in employment, she asked what measures
were being taken to address the issue of sexual harassment in the
workplace.   Would the draft labour code include a specific provision
on sexual harassment?   Had there been a study on the obstacles to
fully implementing such legislation?   Were women aware of their
rights, and was legal assistance available?   Concerning women
entrepreneurs, did women have easy access to credit?   She also wanted
information on women in public-sector employment.

Ms. KAPALATA, expert from the United Republic of Tanzania, said that
women in Belarus were becoming more vulnerable to HIV/AIDS.   Poverty
was a debilitating factor in providing assistance.   Were there any
programmes to make women aware of the specific risks facing them
regarding HIV/AIDS?   What services were available to women who had
been diagnosed with HIV/AIDS?   Despite lack of discriminatory
legislation, why was there still a lack of women foreign service
workers?

Ms. SIMONOVIC, expert from Croatia, asked for information on the new
leave programme for parents.   How many women and men were using the
childcare leave?   Were there any special conditions to receive the
leave?

Mr. MELANDER, expert from Sweden, said that any change of attitude
would be difficult unless non-governmental organizations had the
possibility to work freely without any kind of restrictions.

Ms. KWAKU, expert from Nigeria, noting that several questions from
the pre-session working group had not been answered, asked for more
information on family planning, the impact of the Chernobyl disaster
on women's health, and the impact of HIV/AIDS on women's
health.

Ms. GABR, expert from Egypt, noted that, while health services were
free in Belarus, the health situation of women was not very good.
Given the ageing of the population, she was concerned about the
access of elderly women to health care.   Women were most vulnerable
to poverty.   What was the Government's position regarding the
rights of immigrant workers and their families?

Ms. GASPARD, expert from France, noted gaps in the data provided in
the report on the number of women in higher education.   Establishing
local mechanisms for the advancement of women required qualified
personnel.   Education played an important role in that regard.
Higher education was also needed to undertake gender budgeting.

Ms. MORVAI, the expert from Hungary, raised the issue of
prostitution.   Scientific research proved that prostitution had a
terrible effect on all aspects of a woman's health –-
physical, emotional and psychological, including the health of the
wives of the clients.   Governments generally followed two approaches
regarding prostitution.   One approach was to envision a society free
from prostitution.   The other was to normalize prostitution, making
it a profession.   In that case prostitution was often called
"sex work".   There was great pressure for countries
receiving development assistance to call prostitution "sex
work".   Belarus was one of the last bastions in the region to
call it prostitution.   Under the umbrella of trafficking, there was
an effort to normalize prostitution.   She asked the delegation to
study the so-called Swedish model of prostitution, as it was the only
one that was compatible with gender equality.

Ms. SCHOPP-SCHILLING, the expert from Germany, said she was concerned
about women's position in the labour market.   How had
privatization of the economy impacted women?   Did women cluster in
jobs such as teaching and administration?   Those sectors were
severely underpaid.   Had anything been done to raise wages in
female-dominated sectors of State-controlled employment?   She was
surprised about the large number of women working in high-risk jobs.
What was being done to help women in already difficult financial
circumstances as they grew older?

Country Response

Responding to comments on women's employment, a member of the
delegation said measures to stabilize the labour market were a key
part of the Government's strategy.   There were a number of
issues of concern to the Government, including unemployment.   Women
comprised 53 per cent of the unemployed.   Men with higher education
were less affected by unemployment than women.   In addition, the
unemployment period among women was longer than that of men.   A key
element in the strategy to reduce unemployment was to assist women in
acquiring new skills.

Recent statistics showed that the wage gap was narrowing between men
and women.   Regarding pension issues, she said there was a five-year
difference in the pension age for men and for women.   Women's
pensions were some 25 per cent lower than men's.   She believed
there would be a gradual increase in the pension age.   A draft
pension reform bill was under consideration.   The number of men
taking childcare leave was increasing.

Answering other employment questions, she said lawyers were provided
free of charge in cases of labour disputes.   The issue of sexual
harassment in the workplace had been receiving increased attention,
with law journals publishing articles on the topic.   The problem of
sexual harassment occurred more in the private sector, however, where
social safeguards were not always followed.

Regarding the effects of the Chernobyl disaster, another delegate
said that although the accident had happened some time ago, the
effects were still felt.   Over 2 million people had suffered from
radioactivity, including over 1 million women.   Thyroid cancer was
the most noticeable effect of the disaster.   The rate of thyroid
cancer in Belarus was some 700 times greater.   Cancer tended to
develop over decades, so the impact of the disaster would be felt for
years to come.   The psychological and emotional impact of the
disaster had resulted in falling birth rates.   In fact, the birth
rate had fallen by 40 per cent since the disaster.

Regarding other health issues, another speaker noted that the number
of abortions had sharply dropped, and the number of births among
teenagers had dropped by about 14 per cent.   Almost one third of
women said they regularly used contraception.   In recent years, the
number of women using oral contraceptives had doubled.

On HIV/AIDS, she said the official number of people affected by the
disease was about 4,800.   Women comprised some 30 per cent of those
affected.   The main source of transmission was drug use.   Pregnant
women were invited to test for the disease and women had the right to
decide whether they would have the child or not.   The Ministry of
Health had proposed a set of measures to prevent mother-to-child
transmission.   During pregnancy, HIV-positive women were provided
with medicine, and the delivery was by Caesarean section.   Women and
children did receive material support from the State.

She said a great deal of work was being done to train medical
workers.   Psychological counselling was also available.   The majority
of people under 30 with gonorrhoea and syphilis were women.   Another
factor in sexually transmitted diseases was alcohol and drugs.

Another representative reminded experts that legislation in Belarus
provided equal opportunities in terms of education.   On enrolments in
"general educational institutions", 49.2 per cent were
girls, and 50.8 per cent were boys.   In technical vocational schools,
30 per cent of the students were women.   Women made up almost half of
students enrolled in graduate school and in doctoral programmes. Many
women also headed schools.   Among the primary schools, 96.7 per cent
were headed by women.   In the secondary schools, about half were
headed by women.

Replying to experts' comments about the link between the
elimination of gender stereotypes, including via education, she said
that a system of gender education had begun to be established in the
country, which was aimed at both sexes.   Such courses of study were
being provided in six institutions of higher learning, but that fell
short of society's needs.   Unfortunately, she lacked
gender-disaggregated data on the dropout rate among girls.

Concerning prostitution, another delegate said it was illegal, and no
steps had been taken to weaken those laws.   Regarding the low
involvement of women in foreign service, he did not know the reasons
for that, but if the Committee felt that that situation needed to be
corrected, the necessary consultations would be carried out in that
regard.

Experts' Comments/Questions

Ms. MORVAI, expert from Hungary, said she was glad that domestic
violence was a real concern of the Government, but she wished to know
more about its coherent strategy.   There must be clear legislation.
She recognized that there was a draft bill, but did it clearly
criminalize domestic violence?   Did it include protective or
restraining orders, which provided immediate and effective protection
for women?   Also, how many shelters were available, and how long
could women stay there?   Was training envisaged for the various key
practitioners, such as the judiciary? she asked.

HUGUETTE BOKPE GNACADJA, expert from Benin, was expecting further
information from the report about the areas in which the lack of full
implementation was the most glaring, but that had not been provided.
She also asked about the divorce rate, specifically why it was
increasing each year more rapidly than the number of marriages.
Also, how long would it be before the draft law on violence was
enacted?

Ms. ZERDANI, expert from Algeria, said that the new code on marriage
and the family, which entered into force on 1 September 1999,
proclaimed the equality of the spouses and stated that the consent of
both parties was required.   It also put the marriage age at 18 and
said that the rights and obligations of both parties would be noted
at the time of marriage.   That was a civil marriage, so that was
registered, and any family or marriage problems were to be resolved
by "common consent".   Also, spouses had an equal right to
the use, ownership and disposal of all property acquired during
marriage.

She said that the marriage code could serve as a model for all
countries.   Belarus had made enormous strides in the legal arena.   It
had taken a whole arsenal of laws in three or four years and revised
them.   It should consider taking concrete steps in the meantime until
those laws were really "de facto".

Country Response

A Government representative reiterated that domestic violence was of
paramount importance, and the Government was taking many concrete
steps to overcome it.     There was one women's shelter in Minsk;
there were six or seven similar places elsewhere; and the intention
was to have a second shelter established for battered women.   Great
hopes in that regard were pinned on social services and psychological
and legal interventions.   Should the draft law on domestic violence
be adopted, that would be one more instrument to have a further
impact on those who resorted to violence.   On hiring, guarantees
under the law were not always implemented in practice.   So, the
reasons were often hidden regarding hiring or not hiring.


Experts' Follow-Up

Ms. POPESCU, Vice-Chairperson and expert from Romania, asked if it
was possible to make available in written form to the Committee the
whole range of available statistics disaggregated by sex.

Ms. SIMONOVIC, expert from Croatia, asked again whether the
constitution contained an explicit prohibition of discrimination
based on sex and a specific provision on gender equality or equal
rights of men and women.

Country Response

Much work had been done to compile disaggregated data in the past
five years, and a lot had been done to match that work with the needs
of the end-users, a representative of Belarus said.   That proved
valuable because the collection of statistical data was a very costly
undertaking.   She would provide the Committee with its data, which
was in English and Russian only, in the near future.

She said that the Constitution did have a provision that citizens of
the country were all equal.   Specific provisions on gender-based
discrimination existed in the labour and civil legislation and the
marriage and family code, as well as in the education and rights of
the child law, and health care law.   Hopefully, the draft law on
gender equality would be adopted.   In it, in article 1 provided a
definition of gender discrimination, and, for additional measures
leading to the prosecution of persons who discriminated based on
gender.

Statement by Chairperson

AYSE FERIDE ACAR, Committee Chairperson and expert from Turkey, in
concluding remarks, congratulated the delegation for presenting the
combined fourth through sixth reports.   The Committee was happy to
hear that steps were being taken to ratify the Optional Protocol and
looked forward to Belarus completing the domestic and international
procedures to ratify the Optional Protocol very soon.

While progress had been achieved regarding women in political
decision-making, that area was not yet "problem free",
she said.   The fact that the number of women at the top levels of the
political hierarchy was low was a problem.   Studies into the reasons
why women shied away from high-level politics were needed.
Women's presence in civil society was also important for
enabling them to participate as full-fledged citizens on an equal
footing with men.

Similarly, women's full participation in civil society was a
way for them to develop their potential, she continued.   The
Committee attached great importance to the role of non-governmental
organizations in the protection and promotion of women's human
rights.   It was critically important that women's
non-governmental organizations participate in the different phases of
report preparation and implementation of the Convention in the social
and political spheres.   The Committee urged the Government to
consider ways to ensure the participation of women's
non-governmental organizations in that regard, since the
Convention's full implementation could only be achieved with
the active participation of civil society.

She said the Committee was grateful to hear about legislative steps
to eliminate discrimination and ensure gender equality in the
country.   Such steps must lead to concrete legislation reform to send
the much-needed message that Belarus had the political will to
prioritize women's rights.   She urged the Government to take
determined and sustained action in the near future in the area of
legal reform.

The widespread presence of gender stereotypes was of concern, she
said.   The situation required more targeted action and the
cooperation of non-governmental organizations to eliminate
patriarchal traditions and norms.   Patriarchal traditions formed the
foundations of discrimination against women.   Enlisting the
cooperation of civil society in overcoming stereotypes was a
prerequisite.   She urged a concrete and sustained campaign to
eliminate gender-discriminatory stereotypes.

As dear as motherhood was, the stereotypical view of women
exclusively as mothers helped to perpetuate stereotypes against
women, she said.   The Committee was aware of the difficulties facing
the country, and the worsening health situation was troubling.
Studies and measures were needed to implement effective measures to
combat discrimination against women.   The decrease in the number of
abortions, and the increasing use of contraception were positive.
Induced abortion, however, continued to be a main method of birth
control.   Systematic sex-disaggregated statistics on health and other
issues were needed.

Regarding prostitution and trafficking of women, she said that much
needed to be done to address the root causes of the phenomenon.
Violence against women was another area of great salience, and she
urged the Government to demonstrate a more rigorous commitment in
that regard.   Especially crucial was the need for a special law on
violence.   Awareness raising on the forms and manifestations of
violence was needed, particularly among law enforces and the
judiciary.   International experience suggested that increased
cooperation with women's non-governmental organizations had
yielded positive results in that area.

Regarding employment, the Committee had raised concerns about
gender-segregated labour markets and the issue of sexual harassment,
she said.   Information on measures taken in the face of growing
poverty levels and unemployment was needed in the next report.

* *** *




---
The "women-rights" mailing list provides information on issues related
to women's human rights. Archives of "women-rights" messages, as well
as instructions on how to (un)subscribe to the list, can be found at:
http://www.hrea.org/lists/women-rights/markup/maillist.php


[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]