Assembly of States Parties to finalize rules on elections of judges for International Criminal Court



ACTION ALERT
29 August 2002

ICC ASP TO FINALIZE RULES ON ELECTIONS OF JUDGES

TAKE ACTION NOW TO DEMAND DELEGATES ADOPT RULES FOR FAIR GENDER and 
GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION and A TRANSPARENT PROCESS

United Nations, New York - The first meeting of the Assembly of States 
Parties (ASP) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) will be held from 
3-10 SEPTEMBER 2002 at UN Headquarters in New York. Delegates at this 
meeting will finalize rules governing the elections of judges to the ICC.

PLEASE CONTACT your foreign, justice and women's ministries demanding they 
support the adoption of rules in the ASP that will ensure fair 
representation of women and men and equitable geographic distribution in a 
fair and open process. For a listing of States Parties to the Rome Statute, 
visit: http://www.iccnow.org. See below for a copy of a draft letter.

The negotiations of these rules were so controversial at the last session 
of the Preparatory Commission that delegates were unable to reach agreement 
prior to the deadline which resulted in the item being pushed onto the
agenda of the ASP. These were the only rules that the ICC Preparatory 
Commission was unable to reach consensus agreement on in the four years of
work since the Rome Statute was adopted.

A few governments, led by the United Kingdom, are opposed to any rules for 
the voting process which would restrict their ability to 'vote-trade' prior 
to the elections to ensure their candidate gets elected. Often, governments 
trade votes for posts in international organizations without knowing 
anything about the candidate they have agreed to vote for. This is the 
practice generally in UN elections and it goes against basic democratic 
principles and has operated to the detriment of women.  It is unacceptable 
for the world's first permanent criminal court. Currently, the only 
candidates who have been officially made public by their governments are men.

The nomination period will open at the end of the meeting of the ASP on 10 
September and will close at the end of November 2002. The elections of all 
18 judges are expected to take place in February 2003. The elections must 
ensure the statute's mandates concerning fair representation of women and 
equitable geographic distribution are fully respected in the composition of 
the world's first permanent international criminal court.

In addition, we must pressure our governments to undertake consultations 
with civil society, with women's groups in particular, prior to selecting a
candidate. The selection at the national level is often undertaken by a few 
individuals without notice to civil society and relevant stakeholders. It 
is necessary to demand that governments open this process to civil society 
consultation and review prior to making their selections. They must also 
undertake every effort to seek out and nominate qualified women as 
candidates to these posts.

For a listing of countries that have ratified the Rome Statute and that 
will be participating with full voting rights in the ASP, visit: 
http://www.iccnow.org.

For a listing of government contact information, see http://worldworld.com 
Click on 'enter' at the bottom of the homepage and then select the 
appropriate country.

For a listing of contact information for UN Missions, see
http://www.un.org/Overview/missions.htm.

We ask that you please also send us a copy of your letters.
---------------


[Draft Letter to Ministries, Parliamentarians and Missions]

Re: Procedures for Election of Judges to ICC

Your Excellency,

We are writing to commend [country] for being among the member states at 
the first official meeting of the Assembly of States Parties for the 
International Criminal Court. This is a historic moment and the Rome 
Statute has set a new standard for responding to crimes of sexual and 
gender violence in times of conflict as well in times of so-called peace. 
We hope this unprecedented attention to the mainstreaming of gender will 
continue as the institution finally comes into being.

However, we are gravely concerned about the stalemate that occurred at the 
end of the 10th Session of the ICC Preparatory Commission in the 
negotiations of rules governing the election of judges. This first step is 
a most important one for building the world's trust and confidence in this 
institution that is so desperately needed in the world.

It is critical that rules be adopted now that give effect to article 
36(8)(a) of the Rome Statute concerning a fair representation of women and 
men, equitable geographical distribution as well as representation of the 
principle legal systems. Further, the rules must help ensure that judges 
with expertise on specific issues, in particular violence against women and 
children, are in place in accordance with article 36(8)(b) of the Rome Statute.

We are aware that at the end of the 10th session, negotiations broke down 
over minimum voting requirements and the issue of abstention. We support 
rules that mandate minimum voting requirements for women and men as well as 
geographical balance. However, we view provisions that allow for abstention 
from minimum voting requirements and discontinuation of such requirements 
as undermining the process altogether.

We hope that your delegation to the first meeting of the ICC Assembly of 
States Parties will actively participate in the resolution of these matters 
toward a satisfactory and non-discriminatory outcome that furthers the aims
of the Rome Statute.

Signed,


[your name]

------------------

BACKGROUND:


Though the ICC will not be a part of the United Nations, we know from 
experience of monitoring elections for similar posts in the UN system that 
the need for fair representation of women and men is not taken seriously in 
the elections, which are also often highly suspect in terms of the 
vote-trading that accompanies these elections.

As a result, the presence of women in the international posts has been 
appallingly low. Due to the nature of these processes it has also often 
been difficult for NGO's to monitor the elections and evaluate the 
background of candidates. An added problem is that qualified women are very 
rarely informed about the opportunities of the posts at the international 
level or of the process of nomination at the national level.

Some examples:

Only one woman has ever served as a judge on the International Court of 
Justice throughout its more than 80-year history.

The 34-member International Law Commission had no women throughout its 
55-year history until late last year at which time two women were elected.

In the ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda there have 
been at most 3 women serving at any one time among the 14 permanent judges.

Currently,at the ICTY, there is only one woman serving as a permanent judge.

The ICC will be the first major international institution of the 21st 
century - indeed of this millennium - developed via multilateral treaty. 
The shapers of this historic institution must continue to take bold strides 
in ensuring that women, who make up half the world's population, are 
finally guaranteed an equitable presence in such institutions. It is no 
longer acceptable to abide the reluctance of states to nominate women or to 
blame the lack of appropriate female representation on the myth that there is a
lack of qualified women.


In the same way that the ICC, as an independent and impartial mechanism, is 
intended to be a fairer and more democratic judicial institution as a 
counter to the abusive rule of raw power in the world, so it must also 
counter the effects of power disparities between women and men through its 
procedures and practices. This, along with appropriate geographical 
representation, is critical to ensuring the Court's legitimacy among the 
peoples of the world - which, though it seems obvious, includes women.

In the ICC context, the Women's Caucus is advocating that "fair 
representation" be understood as parity of women and men, meaning a margin 
of 45-55 percent either way. We are also arguing that there is an 
obligation to develop mechanisms in the election process that ensure parity 
in the outcome of the elections. While a parity of women and men on the 
Court is an overarching principle and a critical part of a full-fledged 
commitment to non-discrimination on the basis of gender, the Statute also 
mandates the
presence of judges, male or female, with legal expertise on specific issues 
including violence against women and children.

This moment presents an opportunity to break from the old patterns that 
have prevented women from participating on an equal footing in our 
international institutions. Please take the time to forward these concerns 
to your relevant officials and parliamentarians. At the same time, we urge 
those of you in countries that have ratified the ICC to contact your 
foreign ministries to find out whether and how the nomination process will 
proceed and also whether candidates have already been identified and demand 
that women candidates be considered and put forward. It is expected that 
the first meeting of the Assembly of States Parties will be held in 
September 2002 at which time the nomination process will open. It will then 
likely close some time in late October and then the first elections of the 
full panel of 18 judges will be held in January 2003.

CRITERIA FOR JUDGES OF THE ICC:

The Rome Statute sets out a series of criteria that are to be applied to 
potential candidates for elected posts for the ICC.

Article 36(3)(b) requires that judicial nominees have experience in 
criminal law and procedure with experience as a judge, prosecutor, Or 
advocate in criminal proceedings OR competence relevant areas of 
international law, such
as humanitarian lawa nad the law of human rights.

In addition, article 36(8)(a) of the statute requires that States Parties 
take into account the need for a fair representation of female and male 
judges, equitable geographical representation and a representation of the 
principle legal systems of the world. Article 37 (8)(b) provides that 
States Parties must also "take into Account the need to include judges with 
legal expertise on specific issues including, but not limited to, violence 
against
women or children."

According to article 36(4)(b), candidates must be nationals of a State 
Party to the Rome Statute though they need not be nominated by their own 
country. Candidates must have an excellent knowledge of or be fluent in at 
least one of the working languages of the Court - English, French, Spanish, 
Russian, Chinese and Arabic.

-------------------------------------

For more information about these and other issues or for a copy of our 
short guide to the nomination and election process for Judges to the 
International Criminal Court, please contact us.

Women's Caucus for Gender Justice
33-53 Vernon Blvd. Suite 1
Long Island City, NY 11106
Tel: 718-626-2681
Fax: 718-626-3528
www.iccwomen.org
caucus@iccwomen.org





[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]