USA: More than 600 implicated in detainee abuse



Investigations Lag Two Years After Abu Ghraib Photos

(Washington, D.C., April 26, 2006) – Two years after the Abu Ghraib
scandal, new research shows that abuse of detainees in U.S. custody in
Iraq, Afghanistan, and at Guant?namo Bay has been widespread, and that the
United States has taken only limited steps to investigate and punish
implicated personnel.

A briefing paper issued today, “By theNumbers, [
”http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ct0406 ] presents findings of the Detainee
Abuse and Accountability Project, a joint project of New York University’s
Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, Human Rights Watch and Human
Rights First. The project is the first comprehensive accounting of
credible allegations of torture and abuse in U.S. custody in Iraq,
Afghanistan and Guant?namo.
 
“Two years ago, U.S. officials said the abuses at Abu Ghraib were
aberrations and that people who abused detainees would be brought to
justice,” said Professor Meg Satterthwaite, faculty director of the Center
for Human Rights and Global Justice at NYU Law School. “Yet our research
shows that detainee abuses were widespread, and few people have truly been
brought to justice.”
 
The project has collected hundreds of allegations of detainee abuse and
torture occurring since late 2001 – allegations implicating more than 600
U.S. military and civilian personnel and involving more than 460
detainees.
 
The project found that many abuses were never investigated, and
investigations that did occur often closed prematurely, or stalled without
resolution. In cases where abuses were substantiated and perpetrators
identified by military investigators, military commanders often chose to
use weak non-judicial disciplinary measures as punishment, instead of
pursuing criminal courts-martial. Of the courts-martial that did take
place, the majority resulted in either prison sentences of less than a
year, or punishments that did not involve jail time (such as discharge or
rank-reduction).
 
“We’ve seen a series of half-hearted investigations and slaps on the
wrist,” said Tom Malinowski, Washington advocacy director for Human Rights
Watch. “The government seems more interested in managing the detainee
abuse scandal than in addressing the underlying problems that caused it.”
 
The project found that the vast majority of those who were investigated
for abuse were enlisted military personnel, not officers. Under military
law, officers can be held accountable for the abuses of their subordinates
under the doctrine of command responsibility. The project did not find a
single case in which an officer was held accountable under that doctrine.
 
“There’s been a failure of accountability for detainee abuse at the
command level,” said Elisa Massimino, Washington director for Human Rights
First. “Without accountability up the chain of command, there won’t be
deterrence, and the torture and abuses we’ve documented likely will
continue.”
 
The Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project (DAA) was initiated in March
2005 as a joint research effort to collect and analyze credible
allegations of abuse of detainees in U.S. custody in Afghanistan, Iraq,
and at the Guant?namo Bay detention facility, and to assess what actions,
if any, the U.S. government has taken in response to these allegations.
The project has also recorded investigations, disciplinary measures, or
criminal prosecutions that are linked to abuse allegations.
 
Among the key findings released today: 
 
* Detainee abuse has been widespread. The DAA Project has documented more
than 330 cases in which U.S. military and civilian personnel are credibly
alleged to have abused, tortured or killed detainees. These cases
implicate more than 600 U.S. personnel and involve more than 460
detainees.
 
* Only a fraction of the more than 600 U.S. personnel implicated in these
cases – 40 people – have been sentenced to prison time.
 
* Of the hundreds of allegations of abuse collected by the DAA Project,
only about half appear to have been adequately investigated.

* In cases where courts-martial – the military’s equivalent of criminal
trials – have convened, the majority of prison sentences have been for
less than a year, even in cases involving serious abuse. Only 10 U.S.
personnel have been sentenced to a year or more in prison.
 
* No U.S. military officer has been held accountable for criminal acts
committed by subordinates under the doctrine of command responsibility.
Only three officers have been convicted by court-martial for detainee
abuse.
 
* Although approximately 20 civilians, including CIA agents, have been
referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for
detainee abuse, the Department of Justice has shown minimal initiative in
moving forward in abuse cases. The Department of Justice has not indicted
a single CIA agent for abusing detainees; it has indicted only one
civilian contractor.
 
Recommendations 

In order to remedy the serious failures of accountability that the DAA
Project research documents, the Center for Human Rights and Global
Justice, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First recommend that:
 
* Congress should appoint an independent commission to review U.S.
detention and interrogation policy and operations worldwide.
 
* The secretary of defense and the attorney general should order their
departments: (1) to move forward promptly with investigations of
allegations of torture and other abuse of detainees in U.S. custody
abroad; (2) to initiate prosecutions where the evidence warrants; and (3)
to instruct relevant authorities to ensure that appropriate criminal
action is taken against all persons implicated in killings, torture, and
other abuse, whatever their rank or position.
 
* The secretary of defense should appoint a single, high-level,
centralized authority who can convene and prosecute courts-martial across
the branches of the military to investigate all U.S. military personnel –
no matter their rank – who participated in, ordered, or bear command
responsibility for war crimes or torture, or other prohibited mistreatment
of detainees in U.S. custody.
 
* Congress should implement a check on officer promotions, by requiring
that each branch of the military certify, for any officer whose promotion
requires Senate confirmation, that the officer is not implicated in any
case of detainee torture, abuse, or other mistreatment, including through
the doctrine of command responsibility.

Human Rights Watch Press release




[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]