Edited/Distributed by HURINet - The Human Rights Information Network --------------------------------------------------------------------- ## author : uppercaise@iname.com ## date : 17.07.99 --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/07/cyber/cyberlaw/16law.html AN ARGUMENT FOR 'NETIQUETTE' HOLDS UP IN COURT Issue: Internet/Legal Issues Justice Janet M. Wilson of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto recently ruled that a Web site owner had violated the terms of its Internet service provider's contract, that required it to conform to netiquette, the largely unwritten Internet code of manners. Some lawyers in the United States hailed the decision as a welcome first step in the evolution of Internet common law -- judicial recognition of an emerging body of acceptable customs of behavior among Internet users. Other lawyers, while decrying spam, said that the word "netiquette" is ambiguous, and that companies could use it in their contracts as a catch-all term to punish obnoxious but not injurious behavior. "The use of the Internet is in its relative infancy," Justice Wilson wrote. "In the words of counsel, it is 'an unruly beast.' Or so it will certainly become without a foundation of good-neighbor commercial principles." [SOURCE: CyberTimes, AUTHOR: Carl Kaplan (kaplanc@nytimes.com)] (http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/07/cyber/cyberlaw/16law.html) ---------------------------------- Send mail for the 'huridocs-tech' list to 'huridocs-tech@hrea.org'. Mail administrative requests to 'majordomo@hrea.org'. For additional assistance, send mail to: 'owner-huridocs-tech@hrea.org'. Archives of previous messages posted to the list can be found at: http://www.human-rights.net/huridocs-tech.
[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]