Edited/Distributed by HURINet - The Human Rights Information Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------
## author : clore@columbia-center.org
## date : 12.02.99
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>From Wired News (www.wired.com):
Court Limits Online Speech
by Heidi Kriz
The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
became the first federal jurisdiction
to uphold restrictions on online speech
when it upheld a 1996 Virginia law
barring state employees from engaging
in "sexually explicit communication" on
the Internet.
The American Civil Liberties Union had
challenged the original law on behalf
of six university professors, saying
that it amounted to an attack on
academic freedom. The ACLU is weighing
an appeal of the ruling, which came
Wednesday.
"By the court s logic, a state
university English professor has a
free-speech right to make water-cooler
comments about the more salacious
elements of the Clinton-Lewinsky
scandal, but a political science
professor could be fired for discussing
the same issue in her classroom," said
Ann Beeson, a staff attorney for the
ACLU, in a statement.
Although some state officials will say
the decision is about "preventing state
employees from downloading
pornography," Paul Smith, one of the
George Mason University professors
challenging the law, said it poses a
serious threat to academic freedom.
Smith, who teaches a course on popular
culture that involves the examination
of pornography, was censured by his own
university after the law was passed in
1996. School officials pulled the plug
on his classroom Web site, which
contained academic articles on culture
and pornography.
In its decision, the three-judge panel
acknowledged that the First Amendment
applies when public employees are
speaking on matters "of public
concern." But it went on to say that no
"job-related speech" involves matters
of public concern. Therefore,
job-related speech is not protected by
the First Amendment.
According to Beeson, the court decision
expanded the rationale behind the
original law, which was aimed at online
speech restrictions, and "broaden[ed]
its application to be a potential gag
on all sorts of state employees,
including librarians, professors, and
social workers."
The ACLU is considering whether to
appeal the decision, either before the
full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals or
to the Supreme Court.
----------------------------------
Send mail for the 'huridocs-tech' list to 'huridocs-tech@hrea.org'.
Mail administrative request to 'majordomo@hrea.org'.
For additional assistance, send mail to: 'owner-huridocs-tech@hrea.org'.
Archives of previous messages posted to the list can be found at:
http://www.human-rights.net/huridocs-tech.
[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]