On Monday, January 22, 2007, at 02:36 PM, Wim Taelman wrote: > One of the reactions I received was a warning to take in consideration > that values are related to culture, and that from a multicultural > perspective it is far from evident to reach a consensus on which > should be considered the 'human rights values'. I just can't let this one go by. I have been a lifelong advocate of cultural diversity in public policy and personal lives. I also have come, finally, to see the glaring holes in this standpoint. The issue raised about cultural values is whether a culture has rights that supercedes those of individuals born into it through accident of birth. To which I reply poppycock. The first glaring hole in this idea is that cultures do not "exist" in any literal sense of the term. Cultures are constructs (as are nations, societies, political groups etc.) Cultures are constantly made, remade, evolving, dying away. >From a constructivist standpoint, cultures are made up as we go along. Second, historically cultural diversity evolved as a response to cultural absolutism. But now it has taken on, in a dialectic process, the patina of its own absolutism, that every culture has a right to whatever it determines to do. But who is the culture? Let us also face facts that when we speak of cultures, we are almost always speaking of a small group of men who tell everyone else what to do, and typically abuse their women, whether overtly as, say, in Afghanistan, or subtly, but no less really, as in the United States. Advocating absolute cultural diversity, that whatever some culture does is fine, is to take a good idea and bastardize it into the form it originally battled against. Those who demanded diversity have now become the enemies they fought. What a culture may value one day could be antithetical the next. But, the rights of individuals are constant and non-relative. The United States has constantly rejected the Convention on the Rights of the Child for reasons like people might not be able to spank their children (and showing how stupid American politicians are, they cannot distinguish between a swat and true abuse, although I do not advocate physical punishment at all.) Cultures that reject universal human rights should not be honored with the label "culture." They are instead tyrannies. It is time to move beyond diversity to rights. I have been speaking and writing about these things for some time now and truly see this as a critical issue if we are to be able to advance the dialogue on human rights and social justice. Peace Dan Jordan ======== Global Human Rights Education listserv ======= Send mail intended for the list to < >. Archives of the list can be found at: http://www.hrea.org/lists/hr-education/ **You are welcome to reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the original and listserv source.
[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]