CRC 35th session: Second periodic report of the Netherlands and initial report Aruba



UNITED NATIONS
Press Release

--------------------------------------------------------------------

xxxxxxxxxxCOMMITTEE ON RIGHTS OF CHILD REVIEWS
SECOND PERIODIC REPORT OF THE NETHERLANDS, INITIAL REPORT OF ARUBA
xxxxxxxxxx

19.01.2004

The Committee on the Rights of the Child today considered the second
periodic report of the Netherlands, as well as the initial report of
Aruba, on how the State party was giving effect to the provisions of
the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Introducing the report, Clemence Ross-Van Drop, State Secretary,
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands, said that
her Government was committed to the dissemination of the provisions
of the Convention through various means in which adults and children
were targeted. She added that the Convention was an important
instrument for the Netherlands and the concluding observations and
recommendations of the Committee would give momentum to the
Government's efforts to promote and protect the rights of the child.

Angelique R. Peterson, Deputy Director, Department of Foreign Affairs
of Aruba, said that in August 2003, new legislation regarding sexual
offences had become effective in Aruba which had tightened up and
widened the existing criminal law provisions. Under the terms of that
new law, incitement to child prostitution would carry a heavier
penalty, as would the trafficking of children.

In preliminary concluding remarks, Hatem Kotrane, the Committee
Expert who acted as country rapporteur to the reports of the
Netherlands and Aruba, said, among other things, that the Committee
was entirely satisfied by the dialogue on both reports. He noted that
concern had been expressed during the discussion concerning the
practice of euthanasia and drug abuse, adding that the liberal system
should not stand in the way of the speeding up of administrative
measures concerning children.

Norberto Liwski, the Committee Expert who also served as country
rapporteur to the reports of the Netherlands and Aruba, said that it
was safe to say that in some areas concerning children, it was
essential to go out in depth to make the Convention an important
instrument. He added that the Convention should generate rights to
those vulnerable groups in the society, adding that he was encouraged
by the Government's political will in designing a policy focusing on
the provisions of the Convention.

In the course of the discussion, other Committee Experts also queried
the delegation on such issues as unaccompanied child asylum seekers;
de facto discrimination against children of ethnic minorities;
consumption of alcoholic drinks and drug abuse; the lack of an
ombudsman for children; sexual exploitation of children; the increase
in sexually transmitted diseases; the high rate of schools dropouts;
and the prevention of sex tourism in Aruba, among other things.

The Committee will release its formal, written concluding
observations and recommendations on the reports of the Netherlands
and Aruba towards the end of its three-week session ending on 30
January.

Also representing the Netherlands and Aruba were G.P.M. Scholte,
Deputy Director, Youth Policy, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport;
I. De Jong, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the
Netherlands to the United Nations Office at Geneva; R.D. Hageman,
Press Officer, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; H.C.M. Zoomers,
M. Verbeek, J van der Burg, S.N. van Mujiden, and L.J.van der Heiden,
from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; A.Blom, Ministry of
Social Affairs and Employment; N.P. Levenkamp, R.R. Ter Kuile, A.S.
Thuis, and J.Kok, Ministry of Justice; M.J.M. Weekenborg, Ministry of
Education; H. van der Hoeven, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; A. de
Cuba, Deputy Director, Direction Social Affairs, Aruba; R. van Dijk,
Direction Social Affairs, Aruba; H. Wurzner, Counsellor at the
Permanent Mission of the Netherlands in Geneva; and R.van Horck and
M.Schalken, Interpreters.

The Netherlands is among the 192 States parties to the Convention,
which entered into force on 7 March 1995 for the Netherlands, and as
such it is obligated to present periodic reports to the Committee on
its efforts to implement the provisions of the almost-universal
treaty. The Convention entered into force for the Netherlands with
respect to Aruba on 17 January 2001.

When the Committee reconvenes at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, 21 January, it
is scheduled to take up the second periodic report of India. On
Tuesday, the Committee will meet in private to discuss its work.


Report of the Netherlands

The second periodic report of the Netherlands (CRC/C/117/Add.1)
provides information on the efforts carried out by the State party
since it submitted its initial report in May 1997 and its response to
the Committee's subsequent recommendations. On 7 September 2000, the
Netherlands signed the two Optional Protocols to the Convention on
the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution
and child pornography and on children and armed conflicts. The
ratification process started in 2002.

On non-discrimination, which is article 2 of the Convention, the
report says that the Government of the Netherlands intends to
increase the maximum sentencing for structural forms of racism. A
bill is at present before parliament. The Government has been
planning for some time now to give the ban on age discrimination a
statuary basis

On the right to life and development - article 6 of the Convention -
the report notes that the due care criteria governing agreement to a
request to terminate the life of a patient are laid down in the Act
of 12 April 2001. These provisions also apply to young people. They
state that where the person involved is 18 years or older, his or her
parents or guardians do not in principle need to be involved in the
decision, but if the patient is between 12 and 16, they do. Young
people between 16 and 18 may decide for themselves if they wish to
terminate their lives since they are considered to be capable of
making a reasonable assessment of their own interests.

The report says that the Netherlands Broadcasting Corporation has a
statuary obligation to provide news programmes for children and young
people. The Government of the Netherlands actively promotes reading
among young people. Most libraries did not charge subscription fees
for children under 16, and between 80 to 90 per cent of Dutch
children are library members.

Concerning Aruba (CRC/C/117/Add.2), the report describes the present
situation in the territory and the country's organizations and
agencies committed to protecting children's rights. The report aims
to describe the situation in Aruba from both the Government and NGOs
points of view.


Introductory Statement

CLEMENCE ROSS-VAN DROP, State Secretary, Ministry of Health, Welfare
and Sport of the Netherlands, said that the killing recently of a
teacher by a student had shocked the Government, and it was seeking
to restore safety.

The Government was committed to the dissemination of the provisions
of the Convention on the Rights of the Child through various means in
which adults and children were targeted, she said. It had allocated
200,000 Euros to non-governmental organizations to implement the
plans that aimed at disseminating the treaty.

The Government's efforts were focused on enabling parents in their
efforts to bring up and educate their children, Ms. Ross-van Drop
said. She said that parents were responsible for their children's
education. The Government was also paying more attention to the
implementation of youth policies that would enhance the rights of
children.

She said that the Government was putting in place the necessary
infrastructure to allow children to pursue their education. In that
regard, municipalities held prime responsibility for improving the
educational structures for children and strengthening safety measures
for the youth.

The Convention was an important instrument for the Netherlands and
the concluding observations and recommendations of the Committee
would give momentum to the efforts of the Government to promote and
protect the rights of the child.

ANGELIQUE R. PETERSON, Deputy Director, Department of Foreign Affairs
of Aruba, said that in August 2003, new legislation regarding sexual
offences became effective in Aruba. They had tightened up and widened
the existing criminal law provisions. Under the terms of that new
law, incitement to child prostitution would carry a heavier penalty,
as would the trafficking of children. The law also contained new
provisions on the possession of, trade in and distribution of child
pornography.

She said that for the approximately 26,000 children living on the
island, the Government of Aruba, in cooperation with non-governmental
organizations, aimed at guaranteeing the rights of children as
enshrined in the Convention, regardless of race or nationality.

The Council Ministers had also decided to set up centres for victims
of child abuse. Measures were also taken to increase the number of
foster families in order to reduce the number of children placed in
institutions. Adequate financial allocations were also made to
strengthen youth and child councils. However, there was a lack of
profound research and study on the situation of children, which was
prompting the Government to take further measures to promote the
rights of the child.


Discussion

HATEM KOTRANE, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur
to the report of the Netherlands, said that the Committee noted with
appreciation the positive evolution in the State party in the field
of children's rights. Although they were not yet ratified, the State
party had signed the two Optional Protocols to the Convention. The
Government had also ratified a number of international instruments in
recent years, including the Hague Convention on the Protection of
Children and Cooperation in Matters of Inter-country Adoption in
1998. It had also put in place a series of domestic laws aimed at
promoting and protecting the rights of children.

Mr. Kotrane said that the Committee had noted with satisfaction that
the concerns it expressed after considering the State party's initial
report had been followed up. However, it regretted that the State
party had not taken into consideration the concerns, among other
things, about the lack of cooperation with non-governmental
organizations and civil society in the implementation of the
Convention; the absence of an independent mechanism, such as an
ombudsman for children; the lack of shelters and solutions for
children deprived of a family environment; the persistence of acts of
female genital mutilation inflicted inside the country; and
concerning the teaching of human rights.

NORBERTO LIWSKI, the Committee Expert who also served as country
rapporteur to the report of the Netherlands, said that the
legislation on asylum did not give rights to children whose parents
were not granted residence permits. He welcomed the establishment of
the National Council for the Youth and the systematic coordination of
activities between the Government and NGOs working on the promotion
of child rights. A three-year funding programme of the Council had
been planned but what would happen when the three-year period
elapsed. He noted that the Netherlands had played a leadership role
at the UN General Assembly Special Session for Children. However,
there was no document that set up a national plan of action that was
agreed to at the Summit or an overall policy for adolescents.

On Aruba, he said that the economic and social situation had been
altered drastically due to migration into the territory,
industrialization and the influx of tourists, which had changed the
pattern of relationships between parents and children.

Other Committee Experts also raised a series of questions. An Expert
asked about the status of the Convention within the domestic legal
system and if its provisions were invoked before the courts. With
regard to the reservations made by the State party, the Expert said
that some of them were matters pertaining to interpretation. Although
there was excellent legislation at the national and municipal levels,
there seemed to be a lack of coordination in their implementation. A
specific plan of action at all levels was also lacking.

Another Expert said she was encouraged by the results of a recent
survey which showed that 62 per cent of children knew about the
existence of the Convention. In Aruba, what measures were taken to
help parents to understand, contrary to traditional beliefs, that
children should express themselves freely.

An Expert asked why the Netherlands had not ratified the Ottawa
Convention on Anti-personnel Landmines, which it signed in 2002? What
measures were taken against female genital mutilation, which some
medical practitioners performed in clandestine. What measures were
taken about the de facto discrimination against children of asylum
seekers and children belonging to ethnic groups? What was the
position of the State party on euthanasia?

Another Expert asked about the central coordinating body that oversaw
the implementation of the provisions of the Convention. What measures
were taken in the promotion of awareness among the youth on the
Convention? Were there specific courses provided on the provisions of
the Convention? How did the Government allocate resources for the
promotion of child rights in the various State components?

Which body was the central authority for the promotion and protection
of the rights of the child, asked an Expert. The State party, in its
report, had indicated that a number of non-governmental organizations
were working in the field of children, but did not indicate who
coordinated their work. Although the law prohibited any acts of
discrimination, there was information about the existence of de facto
discrimination on the ground.

With regard to the situation in Aruba, another Expert said that the
migratory tendency into the territory might be dangerous and might
affect children's rights.

Responding, the delegation said that the Government had decided to
increase sentences relating to acts of discrimination. It believed
that children should learn how to be tolerant. Since in some schools,
there were more students coming from minority groups, the Government
was making efforts to make such schools safer. The over-all
Government policy was to maintain safety in all schools.

The Government was seeking advice from non-governmental organizations
during their bi-annual meeting with the State authorities, the
delegation said. With regard to the performance of the local
authorities, the Government had to monitor the achievements made and
should make it clear how subsidies were utilized. There was also a
legal framework between the Government and the municipalities on
childcare activities, including systematic coordination of
operations.

On the creation of an ombudsman for children, the delegation said
that there were various forms of ombudsman-like services, including
the youth council and societal development, hotline services and
child-complaints procedures. Although the Committee had recommended
the establishment of an Ombudsman, the State party did not see the
need for the creation of another institution whose activities would
overlap with the existing bodies.

In the Netherlands, nothing was considered to be a taboo, and that
was why it had reached the present stage of legalizing euthanasia,
the delegation said. The law on that issue was implemented with the
strict monitoring of the medical authorities. The law applied to
children between 16 and 18. The State party believed that children in
that age group were able to understand their acts and assume
responsibility for their decisions.

Reacting, a number of Experts asked how children between 12 and 16
years could understand medical diagnosis concerning their ailments.
The Experts noted that there were also cases in which parents decided
that acts of euthanasia be exercised on their children.

The Committee Experts continued raising questions on the main
clusters of civil rights and freedoms; family environment and
alternative care; basic health and welfare; and education, leisure
and culture. An Expert said that medical doctors should be obliged to
report to the authorities on cases of ill-treatment of children,
without hiding themselves behind medical ethnics of confidentiality.

The delegation was asked to provide information on cases of female
genital mutilation.

Another Expert asked how the State party monitored the activities of
agencies dealing with inter-country adoptions, which, having their
headquarters in the Netherlands, operated in other countries through
their branches.

An Expert asked what measures were taken to apply the compulsory
education provisions in Aruba, which were not effectively
implemented. Another Expert appreciated that the Netherlands had met
the UN target on international cooperation on development and
encouraged the State party to continue in its efforts. She asked why
14 per cent of births in Aruba were not registered? She joined other
Experts who expressed concern about the use of euthanasia, especially
involving children.

Other Experts asked about child mortality rates; unaccompanied asylum
children; the lack of obligation to report child abuse; and the
teaching of Aruba children in Dutch instead of their vernacular,
among other things.

Responding, the Aruba delegation said that the island got its
autonomy in 1986 and it ran its own business through its executive,
legislative and judiciary bodies. The Government had appointed a
Committee on the Rights of the Child, which promoted the rights of
the child as enshrined in the Convention. The territory was one of
few places where the number of migrants was high. Education had been
made free of charge. The law on compulsory education had not yet been
adopted and it was still in the hands of the legislators. The
language of instruction was Pepiamento and Dutch. The main language
in Aruba was Papiamento, while Dutch was hardly used, except in
Government papers and the courts, but it was nevertheless the
prevailing language within education. Dutch was the language of
instruction in primary, general secondary and most vocational
education institutions.

The Government of Aruba had taken preventive measures against
sexually transmitted diseases and teenage pregnancy, the delegation
said. It was observed that the annual carnival in which young people
participated was one of the main causes for such incidents. Being
aware of that cause, the Government disseminated preventive
information before the parade took place. In the past, children born
after the event were termed as "Carnival Babies".

If unaccompanied children requested asylum according to the Geneva
Convention on the Status of Refugee, they could be granted it if
their justification met the requirements of that Convention. At the
same time, if the request was rejected, the child could stay in the
country until he or she reached 18 years. If accompanied children
were included in the requests for asylum by the parents, their
situation depended on the decision concerning the parents.

School dropouts remained an unresolved problem, the delegation said.
Plans were laid down to reduce the rate by 30 per cent in 2006 and to
reach 5 per cent dropout by 2010. In 2001, new legislation had
entered into force making it compulsory for young people under the
age of 23 to report to the local municipality if they dropped out of
school without gaining basic qualification to enter the labour
market. Within each region, a single municipality was responsible for
the coordination of action to enforce compulsory school attendance.

The Government had taken a series of measures to integrate children
with disabilities into the mainstream educational system and the
society, the delegation said. Parents of children with disabilities
had to follow the development of their children in education, with
the assistance received from the State.

The taboo on talking about threats to safety in schools had been
broken, partly by the safe school campaign, the delegation said. The
act on education inspection had included a provision enabling serious
forms of physical violence and mental abuse – bullying –
to be reported to inspectors.

The number of young girls under 20 years having babies had increased,
the delegation said. Many of the cases concerning teenage pregnancy
involved members of ethnic groups.

A safe sex campaign had been launched by the State in order to
prevent sexually transmitted diseases, the delegation said. The use
of preservatives, including condoms, had been encouraged as a
preventive means.

Because of the economic recession, young people now spent less on
alcoholic beverages than in recent years, the delegation said. It was
estimated that 40 per cent of boys used to drink alcoholic drinks,
which had been an unhealthy situation.

Dutch law tolerated the possession and smoking of five grammes of
cannabis, the delegation said. The situation had remained stable with
only 18 per of teenagers smoking cannabis. The Government had a
strict policy not to allow the use of a high dose among the
population.

The Netherlands had a level of vaccination of up to 95 per cent,
which was enough to protect children from diseases, including polio,
the delegation said.

Asked why same-sex couples adopted only Dutch children, the
delegation said while homosexual marriage was permitted under the
Dutch law and they could adopt children, inter-country adoption was
reserved only for opposite-sex couples. That measure was taken on the
basis that some countries might not allow the adoption of children by
homosexuals.

Committee Experts continued raising questions on the administration
of juvenile justice; children who were deprived of their liberty;
economic exploitation of children, including child labour; sexual
exploitation; and the sex tourism in Aruba, among other things.

Responding, the delegation said that with regard to refugees,
additional provisions were included in accordance with European
standards. The measures taken against the influx of refugees was to
reduce their number by 15 per cent. Any asylum seeker had the right
to appeal against the decision concerning his or her request.

Children, whose requests for asylum were not yet decided upon, were
educated in English with the view of their expulsion to their
countries of origin. The level and quality of education was the same
as the one given in Dutch.

In juvenile justice, the Government always insisted on rehabilitating
and integrating the youth, the delegation said. In some cases, young
detainees could remain in detention during the night while they were
allowed to attend school during the day.

The law prohibited children below the age of 16 years to work;
however, for children above the age of 12, work was tolerated
concerning the performance of light tasks, the delegation said. The
International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 138 on the minimum
age of employment was applied with regard to child labour.

Child asylum seekers were not treated on an ad hoc basis, as alluded
by one Expert, the delegation said. Whenever a case was presented, a
representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
was contacted and informed. Refugee status was given to individuals
who fulfilled the requirements.


Preliminary Concluding Remarks

HATEM KOTRANE, the Committee Expert who served as country rapporteur
to the report of the Netherlands, said that the Committee was
entirely satisfied with the dialogue on the reports of the
Netherlands and Aruba. The Netherlands was a liberal country. He said
that concerns were expressed during the discussion concerning the
practice of euthanasia and drug abuse. The liberal system should not
stand in the way of the speeding up of administrative measures
concerning children. He hoped that the conditions of children would
further be improved in the Netherlands and in Aruba.

NORBERTO LIWSKI, the Committee Expert who also served as country
rapporteur to the report of the Netherlands, said that it was safe to
say that in some areas concerning children, it was essential to go
out in depth to make the Convention an important instrument. The
Convention should generate rights to those vulnerable groups in the
society. He was encouraged that the head of the delegation had
expressed the political will of her Government to design a policy
focusing on the provisions of the Convention. The increase in budget
for the youth was also an encouraging sign, he said.


Concluding Remarks by Delegation

G.P.M.SCHOLTE , Deputy Director, Youth Policy, Ministry of Health,
Welfare and Sport, appreciated the compliments forwarded by the
Experts on the preparation of the report and on the way it was
presented to the Committee. She was glad to hear that their work had
been highly valued. She wondered how the concluding document of the
Committee would reflect the liberal climate of her country. She noted
that together with non-governmental organizations, the Government
would implement the recommendations of the Committee once they
received them.





--
The "child-rights" mailing list provides information on issues related
to children's human rights. Archives of "child-rights" messages, as well
as instructions on how to (un)subscribe to the list, can be found at:
http://www.hrea.org/lists/child-rights/markup/maillist.php


[Reply to this message] [Start a new topic] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index] [List Home Page] [HREA Home Page]